<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RyanKenward.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryankenward.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryankenward.com</link>
	<description>- and now you know!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics by admin</title>
		<link>http://ryankenward.com/archives/832/comment-page-1#comment-8796</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryankenward.com/?p=832#comment-8796</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called moderation.  I don&#039;t want a ton of bot comments.  Thanks or your feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called moderation.  I don&#8217;t want a ton of bot comments.  Thanks or your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics by James</title>
		<link>http://ryankenward.com/archives/832/comment-page-1#comment-8795</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryankenward.com/?p=832#comment-8795</guid>
		<description>Nice. You deleted my comment on single payer healthcare in South Korea, and how South Korea&#039;s government-managed healthcare is succesful, and you didn&#039;t even provide an argument of your own. I thought libertarians were about free speech, but clearly, you would like to silence someone you don&#039;t want to listen to when you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. You deleted my comment on single payer healthcare in South Korea, and how South Korea&#8217;s government-managed healthcare is succesful, and you didn&#8217;t even provide an argument of your own. I thought libertarians were about free speech, but clearly, you would like to silence someone you don&#8217;t want to listen to when you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics by James</title>
		<link>http://ryankenward.com/archives/832/comment-page-1#comment-8786</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryankenward.com/?p=832#comment-8786</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you lack most of the facts, or are trying to hide them. I lived in South Korea for a few years, and I have to correct some issues with your article. According to this article, you are saying that South Korea is successful because of public choice options when it comes to selecting healthcare services. While South Korea does have public options for healthcare, it isn&#039;t the biggest reason for South Korea&#039;s success in universal healthcare. 

In the late 1990s/early 2000s, the South Korean government consolidated all private health insurers to create a government-managed single payer pool. This put a lot of people in the insurance industry at the time out of business, but in the end, every South Korean now has access to cheap, government financed universal healthcare. It is because of government regulation that South Korea&#039;s healthcare system is so successful.

You however are arguing that the Democratic Party is &quot;killing thousands of jobs in the insurance industry, increasing taxes on all of us, and forcing all people to go to these hospitals which can barely handle patients they have now&quot;. Unfortunately, that is exactly what the South Korean government did. They put a lot of private insurers, and people working for private insurers out of business, they increased taxes as a direct replacement to private insurers, and they supposedly force &quot;all people to go to these hospitals which can barely handle patients they have now&quot;. Well, sorry to say this, but when I was living in Korea back in 2005, I went in for weekly non-critical services, and I never had to wait in any lines.

Your email is highly misleading. You are attempting to base the merits of the Korea&#039;s healthcare system on Libertarian economics when in fact, South Korea&#039;s healthcare success is due to the government mandated, and regulated single payer pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you lack most of the facts, or are trying to hide them. I lived in South Korea for a few years, and I have to correct some issues with your article. According to this article, you are saying that South Korea is successful because of public choice options when it comes to selecting healthcare services. While South Korea does have public options for healthcare, it isn&#8217;t the biggest reason for South Korea&#8217;s success in universal healthcare. </p>
<p>In the late 1990s/early 2000s, the South Korean government consolidated all private health insurers to create a government-managed single payer pool. This put a lot of people in the insurance industry at the time out of business, but in the end, every South Korean now has access to cheap, government financed universal healthcare. It is because of government regulation that South Korea&#8217;s healthcare system is so successful.</p>
<p>You however are arguing that the Democratic Party is &#8220;killing thousands of jobs in the insurance industry, increasing taxes on all of us, and forcing all people to go to these hospitals which can barely handle patients they have now&#8221;. Unfortunately, that is exactly what the South Korean government did. They put a lot of private insurers, and people working for private insurers out of business, they increased taxes as a direct replacement to private insurers, and they supposedly force &#8220;all people to go to these hospitals which can barely handle patients they have now&#8221;. Well, sorry to say this, but when I was living in Korea back in 2005, I went in for weekly non-critical services, and I never had to wait in any lines.</p>
<p>Your email is highly misleading. You are attempting to base the merits of the Korea&#8217;s healthcare system on Libertarian economics when in fact, South Korea&#8217;s healthcare success is due to the government mandated, and regulated single payer pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future Technology Predictions and Theories by admin</title>
		<link>http://ryankenward.com/archives/877/comment-page-1#comment-8735</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryankenward.com/?p=877#comment-8735</guid>
		<description>Great comment, I appreciate it!  Sorry it took me so long to respond.

All the best,
Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment, I appreciate it!  Sorry it took me so long to respond.</p>
<p>All the best,<br />
Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future Technology Predictions and Theories by David</title>
		<link>http://ryankenward.com/archives/877/comment-page-1#comment-8608</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryankenward.com/?p=877#comment-8608</guid>
		<description>Travel back in time?

Maybe one day, so very far into the future, our kind may be able to travel faster than light. If so, maybe that will enable them to catch up with our present ( our &quot;present&quot; being images/light traveling across the universe ). Possibly able to view us but unable to interact. Like seeing a star&#039;s light tonight required lightyears to reach us and pass us by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Travel back in time?</p>
<p>Maybe one day, so very far into the future, our kind may be able to travel faster than light. If so, maybe that will enable them to catch up with our present ( our &#8220;present&#8221; being images/light traveling across the universe ). Possibly able to view us but unable to interact. Like seeing a star&#8217;s light tonight required lightyears to reach us and pass us by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

